The Second Summer – Undertow

The Second Summer, hailing from Chicago, characterizes their musical style as Hard Power Pop. Their latest release, Undertow, hit the airwaves a few weeks back and is packed with fantastic tracks. Steve Gatland shares with Sweet Sweet Music blog the story behind the album’s creation.


You can discover ‘Something’ featured on the Best Power Pop of 2024 Spotify Playlist.


Success can take on different meanings as time goes on. When envisioning success for this new record, what does that picture look like now?

Maybe it’s because where we all are in our lives, but what we really care about is having our music resonate with people in an authentic way. That is success for us. We don’t write cute or super light-hearted material (not that there’s anything wrong with that), but try to write about the feelings, emotions, stories, observations that we experience as we live our lives. We hope listeners can relate to some of what we’re writing about …

The song Invisible has a lot of angles to it, but one is the feeling of being left out, not fitting in, being unseen. The song centers on a relationship that has turned, but the song also ties to a theme we write a lot about, which is growing older. As we get older, we slowly become invisible. When we are young, our light shines brightly and that makes us very visible to the world (sometimes for the better, sometimes for worse, but definitely visible) … as we get older, our light becomes duller and duller, until we are on longer seen.

The song Undefeated is about a person(s) that we likely all know … the person that can’t ever say they’re sorry. The ability to say sorry, apologize, admit you’re wrong, is the single best thing we can do when we screw up. But there are many people, including some of the most powerful people in the world, that simply cannot say “I’m sorry.” And because of this character flaw (because that’s what we think it is), people waste time, money, energy, and emotions running around in circles trying to explain away (often by lying) their actions. And, most importantly, this can and does end up hurting a lot of people … emotionally, physically, financially. All because someone did not have the character to say “I messed this up … I’m sorry … please accept my apology.”

We hope that people can relate to songs like these.

As an artist, the act of baring your emotions to the world is profound. Does this vulnerability come naturally to you, or is it a constant journey of finding comfort?

We are very comfortable expressing our feelings and emotions via our music. Most of our songs are written from the perspective of the triumphs and tragedies (and everything in between) that we all experience as we go through life. We have been around the block – families, jobs, relationships started, relationships ended – and those experiences are a really big part of our material. We don’t write about these things in a sullen or melancholy way, but in what I’d call a sober way.

The other big cloud that we all live under is the cloud of getting older. In a lot of ways, our music, our band name, our outlook stems from this belief that although we’ve done a lot of living and learning the hard way, there is always a chance for a second summer. Whatever that might be for you, we believe that even when youth (summer) has passed you by, there are still many summers left – you just need to chase them.

Can you recall the last instance when you felt the immediate certainty of having penned a hit song?

Just to be clear, we have never written a hit song … maybe someday we will. We’re lucky, I think, in that we’re not really trying to write hit songs per se. As I said earlier, we want to write songs that resonate with folks.

That said, we have some songs that consistently get better reviews, feedback, and attention than others. The song “Something” has been a top attention getter for us with a lot of radio play, and feedback from other artists. Of course, it was also the last song we recorded, and we almost didn’t put it on the release. The old saying that sometimes the best songs come the quickest and most naturally has been true for us. And Something is a good example of that. We knew that it was a really good song in rough form, and felt even more confident that it was when it came out of mixing. But, we can’t say that we ever had certainty it was going to be well received. But we had a feeling!

Among the compliments you’ve received, is there one that remains etched in your memory? If so, what made it particularly unforgettable?

First and foremost, every time someone says they like our songs, we are humbled and grateful. It doesn’t matter if it’s the first time, or the 1,000th time, we are always so thankful. The one memory that jumps out playing our first show in Chicago. We were booked by Emily at Bang-A-Gong to play in late December at Montrose Saloon.

After our set, someone (Corey!) come up to us and said that she loved our sound, that her brother had a radio show, and that she had sent him a video of our performance and suggested he play us … and the next week we were on The Power Pop Shoppe radio program. That memory will always stick with us. It’s been great getting feedback from some great Chicago and Illinois bands like Van Go, Thrift Store Halo, Dreamjacket and Half Catholic.

And it’s been fun hearing feedback from critics and radio folks. We’ve been compared to Teenage Fanclub, The Posies, Buffalo Tom, The Connells, and more. Just being in the same sentence with these bands is crazy! And while we like all those bands, I would not say they were the bands we listened to the most growing up and into adulthood. Many of us were into grungy-90’s rock, punk, prog-rock and even metal, although bands like Material Issue, Nada Surf, and Descendents were definitely in the mix.

Looking ahead to the next couple of months, what exciting plans or projects are on the horizon for you?

We have a busy schedule with gigs through the summer. We’re really excited to be playing the International Pop Overthrow Festival in Chicago, likely on April 27th (the festival runs from April 19-17 at Montrose Saloon in Chicago). This festival has so many great power pop, indie rock bands and more, and we are really looking forward to it.

We’ve been connecting with some really awesome Chicago-area bands, and are working to put together some shows with them. Stay tuned by following our social media pages on Facebook and Instagram.

We have a ton of new songs that are ready, and we’ve been weaving (and will be weaving them) in our sets.

And, we are hoping to release more singles and then a second LP/EP in later 2024 or early 2025.

Studio moments often hold a touch of magic. Could you recount an instance that stands out as the most enchanting during your creative process?

Our songs were tracked in a home studio. The performances were really good, but the recording quality was not superb (we have good amps, guitars, basses … but not good mics, and we definitely were not super knowledgeable about micing techniques). We were really worried that we would have to go back and re-track all of them in a studio … which would take a lot of time and money.

A Chicago studio, Gravity, mixed our songs and we were blown away by how they came to life sonically and dynamically. There is no doubt the tracking would have been better if we had done it at Gravity, but at the same time Gravity was able to squeeze every last ounce of tone and feel out of these tracks, and we were blown away by how awesome they sounded.

We worked together on the mixes, but Gravity really helped us get them to a great place. When we first heard the mixes we were floored by how big and beautiful they sounded. The song “Never Not Forever” really exemplifies this … the tracks were well played and the performances were great, but it was somewhat thin sonically. When it come-out of mixing it had been transformed into a song that was at times spartan, and at times thunderous. There is no way we could have even come close to that without working with a studio.

How would you describe the evolution of your sound in this new album compared to your previous works? Were there intentional shifts in style or themes?

We have always been rooted in what I would call hard power pop, but our earlier stuff leaned a little more in the direction of pop-punk. We’ve brought more harmonies to our new material, added more texture and played some slower tempo tunes, and our lyrics have changed to be more reflective of the lessons we’ve all learned the hard way. None of this was intentional. It was really just where the songwriting went and we didn’t resist it.

KING MIXER – Hang On (interview)

Please meet Eric Howell . As King Mixer he just released Hang On: 11 songs, 11 different styles, one specific sound. NICE!! Being a creative, being independent, being Eric Howell … Read the interview you will learn a thing or 2 (or 3 … or 4 …) … about what that is like.

If you want listen or buy first, go here

Hang on is also available on iTunes, Amazon en Spotify.

 

king-mixer-hang-on.jpg

You wrote a very nice article about ideas that change while/during recording, writing, mixing the album (read). Can you give an example? Did you enjoy the “making” of Hang on?

This record, Hang On, is my second album.  For the first record I more or less did all the heavy lifting. That is to say, writing the songs, producing and mixing it myself, arranging all the parts, over many many years, and I also made a feature length documentary about the process, particularly focusing on my life in music and the fifteen year journey
that became that record (“Eric Howell’s Greatest Hitch! Vol One). That record was about closure, and making room for new sounds, new attitudes and ideas.

Flash forward a few years and suddenly I realize how time has once again gotten away from me and I hadn’t recorded any new songs in a while. I had been playing lots of “survival gigs”, corporate wedding band type stuff, bread n butter gigs to pay the bills, and I was not very pleased with myself artistically. I was sort of in a creative funk.

However through playing in the wedding band I met some of Chicago’s best musicians, guys who can really play their instruments (certainly a lot better than I can) and as I began to dream up a new game plan for a new studio recording, several of the players from the wedding band wound up in a rehearsal studio working on King Mixer songs with me. And I wasn’t going to tell musicians who were really such solid players HOW to play their
parts.  It was more a matter of suggestions from me and letting them
create on top of my ideas.

So from the dead end corporate gigs came these relationships with great musicians who became my friends and we made this record. A lot of the songs on Hang On were incomplete upon heading into the studio, which is something I almost never do.  Even though I’ve only got two records out, I’ve been in and out of various recording studios
since I was nineteen years old, and by and large I’ve always seen the
recording studio as a place to really have your shit together before going
in.  Always watching the studio clock, etc.  I’ve gotten terrific results that way, but with this album, I decided to crowd fund it via GoFundMe.com, and through that platform I raised what I felt was enough money to be able to leave the songs unfinished, take some musically creative chances and leave the door open for more spontaneous creativity
while the clock was running.

This led to a sound and attitude on this latest record which I never would’ve achieved had I gone my tried and true traditional route of having the band well rehearsed before going into the studio. Plus I had an excellent Producer in Christian Cullen, and he
offered me two options when working with him:  1) he would produce the
record from a technical standpoint but not offer up any arrangement
suggestions on the songs themselves or 2) he would make his opinions known
about where he saw the songs heading, editing decisions, additional vocal
lines as well as entire beds of music etc and basically become an integral
part of the creative process.

Christian is very very good, and we’re old pals and I’d never worked with him before on a record and I wanted the full Monty out of this crowd funded record, so I chose option 2, without hesitation. The record would’ve sounded entirely different had I chose the
first option. I find people are reacting positively to a lot of the spontaneity we allowed to come through.

So that happens when you set out to make a record. Particularly in my case
I didn’t have a band in which I’d been playing live with for months if not
years, so a lot of the way this album came together (or not) had very
little to do with musical ability and more to do with scheduling.
Scheduling was a bit of a challenge on this record.

Songs which were begun with a certain set of players might take months to complete because I had to wait until the other guys were back from being on the road with their
main band, or whatever. I left a lot of space for the other guys to come
back and finish their parts, or in some cases I wanted them to come back
for another session and create brand new ideas on top of what me and
Christian had dreamed up.  I didn’t want to finish the songs in a flurry
of overdubs between myself and Christian in the studio, so I’d wait on
other players…and wait some more…and more waiting until eventually it
was like, “fuck it, I’m playing guitar on this album!”

But it wasn’t my intention to do so.  It was just the tricky bit about scheduling the
players.  But it all works out. People have said that one of the main
differences in this record over my first album is the guitar playing, that
my playing has really developed and so on. Little do they know I had an
absolute killer guitar player named Grant Tye tapped to play on the entire
album but Grant was on tour with Robbie Fulks during much of my studio
sessions and consequently he only ended up playing guitar on four songs,
and I had to play lead guitar on the others.

This dynamic forced me to clean up my chops a bit because I didn’t want people to hear the finished record and say, “Wow, great guitar playing on THOSE FOUR SONGS! Not so
much on the others”  LOL  So I was forced to step it up a bit, in a way
thanks to Grant NOT being available!”

I enjoyed making this record immensely with an incredible team of
musicians and recording engineers in top flight studios.  But when you’re
spending gobs of money making what essentially is an indie record to be
played live in small clubs there’s a bell curve, a period where trying to
make it sound as if you’re signed to Warner Brothers makes no sense. It’s
easy for the project budget to spin out of control and the next thing you
thinking is, “well, the album artwork should look as good as this is
sounding”.

So budget for the artwork started skyrocketing.  Had to bring
that under control. Then of course the record has to be mastered properly.
This proved a major challenge. I’m pretty sure the album was mastered five
times in an attempt to ‘get it right’. There goes a lot of money as well.
Then there was some sort of technical snafu in the actual CD duplication
process, wherein I got all excited when the UPS delivery truck dropped off
a thousand copies of the album…and I put it on and it was all sped up,
like “we represent the Lollypop Guild” in The Wizard Of Oz! All one
thousand copies were useless. The manufacturing company ate the cost and
promised to issue another run of thousand copies once I sent them a new
master. So I decided this was an opportunity to fix all the little things
that still bugged me about a few of the mixes.  So I remixed the entire
record, secretly, and sent THAT master to be duplicated, which is now how
the record sounds today. But these were all costly learning experiences
and it takes a toll on your psyche and your will to get the record “out
there”.

I’m super happy with Hang On and the early reviews have been solid and I
learned a lot from the experience and wouldn’t change a thing. But my next
record is going to be a folk album, recorded for $500 bucks with one set
of musicians over one long weekend!!! Enough of this “two years to make a
record” crap.
KM-retouch-e1423471815164.jpg

Hang On contains a lot of different styles, all combined in a very specific King Mixer-sound. It’s one of the reasons why I like the album so much. What do you think?

I appreciate you saying, “specific King Mixer sound”, Patrick. Because
it IS specific, but I suppose it’s because it’s coming from one central
songwriter. That’s the only specific thing about what I’m doing. I wrote
all the songs. The rest of my approach is basically to ‘throw the
spaghetti against the wall and see what sticks” as far as the SOUND of the
record. So it’s deliberately all over the map, sonically. And you know
what? People advise you in the music business to be “one thing” or “one
sound” so that the public can decide if they like you or not. But none of
us are just “one thing” or “one sound” anyway. No true artists are,
anyway.

People will either like you for having a certain sound or dislike
you for having that same sound. And everyone just grabs and shares files
these days anyway. Its very hard to get people into the cult of
personality, anymore. So why not make your sound a LOT of sounds? Why not
make The White album your mission statement? So in the case of King Mixer,
yes. I deliberately mix it up, running a variety of styles up the musical
flagpole, for a specific result. And that result is to create music from
one central creative force that sounds like several bands for the price of
one! It’s like those old five CD players’ member those? With King Mixer,
everything’s on shuffle. On this latest album you get power pop, a bit of
ska, a bit of Americana, some guitar rock, some brit pop, some solid gold
70s’ type stuff, a ballad, then it gets damn near “jam bandy” and also
some soul horns combined with a bit of EDM are happening at one point. All
on one record, folks! This may not end up being the case with every album,
but so far, with my first two records, “The White Album variety” has been
the goal. And I believe that goal has been achieved to astonishing
results, he says, immodestly! But don’t take my word for it, have a listen
for yourself, people.
If we want to know you, which song do we have to listen to? And why?

Well,, that’s hard to say, since I wrote all the songs it seems the only
answer is: If you want to know “me”, listen to all of ’em! But who listens
to music to get to know an artist who’s music they’ve scarcely, if ever,
heard before? I certainly don’t. The idea is, “which songs of mine most
remind you of YOU? Or someone you know?” That is the question. It’s only
about me when I’m writing the song in my little room with a guitar. It
should cease being about myself after that, and if the songs are well
written they should connect with YOU, on a level that doesn’t require
knowing or caring much about me, personally. I don’t always write about
myself, a lot of it can be snippets of conversations and one liners that
other people say which sound like good song titles and I’ll run with that.
And it can certainly go a lot deeper as we get older.  I’m listening to
what a lot of friends are going through with regard to their families and
trying to  put food on the table while holding down questionable jobs in
an unsteady market these days.

This record seems to have more than a few songs that address the passing of time, and perhaps being on the losing side of Father Time’s agenda but not giving up without a fight. Songs like “One Too Many” and “Days That Used To Be” address these issues, for sure.
We did a single, which is not on the album, called “45”.  Someday I’ll put
it out as a 7″inch but for now it’s only available digitally on bandcamp,
and maybe itunes, I think. It’s got a Cheap Trick meets Foo Fighters vibe
about it but it’s also a bit throwback with a psychedelic 60’s element to
it. And lyrically I’m singing at the top of my range about aging!
Hahahaha! and it’s a jam! We will not go quietly into the long goodnight!
So, yeah, I suppose the song that is most relevant and autobiographical on
the record is one that’s NOT on the record but is definitely, at the
moment, most like myself, and probably like you, too.  “45”. Sometimes I
can’t believe I’m still alive.
The music industry has changed a lot (or so they say). What did it bring
you? And what not?

 

 

I found an old copy of Rolling Stone a few weeks ago. On the cover it
said, “Why The Music Industry Is Over!” or some such drivel. This
particular issue of Rolling Stone was from 1998 or something. So they’ve
been selling us this perpetual lie that “the music industry is in trouble”
for 20 years. Clearly we’re still here and major industry is still putting
together major tours and people are still paying absurd prices to see
their glory days bands in stadiums or at festivals. It didn’t die, it’ll
never go away.

I think what’s happened in the sea change of technology is
that the music industry has been humbled, but it”s not “in trouble” and
it’ll never be over. Adjustments have to be made.  But on a very personal,
attainable level the advances in technology and internet platforms are
what’s allowed me to crowdfund my latest effort, it’s what allows artists
to reach their audience and build upon that audience, hitting everyone
with the same message at the same time, instantly from wherever an artist
happens to be when they hit “send”, without any number of record company
middle men to muck it up, or save your ass.  That is cool.  The fact that
everyone and their grandmother is doing the same thing, people who are not
artistically minded posting to Instagram and calling whatever they had for
lunch an “Event” worthy of the same kind of attention I want you to give
my music….not so cool. Let’s move on…

She tells you she will decide on a 5-song-mix tape if there is going
to be a second date. Which ones would you put on?

 

If they have to be my own songs, I’d be sure to give her:

1) Zookeepers

2) Gravity

3) Somethin’ Else (people have been known to weep openly upon hearing it so I’ll score some emo points on this one, maybe)

4) Days That Used To Be (cuz it sounds fun…but there’s a message that all women of conscience will pick up on!)

and finally…

5) And That’s All  (because we always close with it at club shows and it’s good to go out with a bang and not a whimper!).

If they don’t have to be King Mixer songs, it will be

1) She’s The One (Bruce Springsteen and The E Street Band, from Born To Run.  If she doesn’t like Springsteen, I will eventually kick her to the curb before the third date anyway)
2) Tom Petty –  Even The Losers (ditto to the above criteria)
3) New Radicals – You Only Get What You Give (a spectacular “feel good” song which features the greatest drum ‘flam’ in the history of recorded music. And if she catches that without any prompting from me, I will propose to her, on the second date, instantly).
4) The Revivalists – Wish I Knew You (let’s assume she’s significantly younger than me on this date in question. This song adroitly handles a potential deal breaking dynamic)
5) Badfinger – Day After Day (If she doesn’t dig this melancholy gem, she’s got no heart)

What’s up for the next couple of months?

 

I’m actually starting to sift through my considerable barrage of demo
recordings, seeing what grabs me and what might have the makings of the
next record for King Mixer. There’s all kinds of crap on literally fifty
to sixty tapes and gobs of song farts of files, all just rough ideas,
sputtered drunkenly into a recording device. That’s how I typically start
my process.

By the time Thanksgiving rolls around I hope to be back in
the studio, working with an entirely new set of talent in an entirely new
way, to make entirely new King Mixer music. Oh and I’m heading to Newport
Beach, California on a gig in a couple weeks, and then to Hollywood. I do
get inspired when I’m out west.  It’s ridiculously beautiful there from
the weather to the ocean to the people. I totally get Brian Wilson’s sense
of melancholy mixed with hope and adventure in all those Beach Boys songs.
Last time I was in Newport I must’ve come up with eight to ten song ideas
just staring out at the waterline, strumming my guitar from a window view.
And they were all crazy good pop songs, baby!